![]() |
Herbert Spencer |
Survival of The Fittest
One
byproduct of industrialization and the subsequent rapid accumulation and consolidation of
wealth during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, was
the generalized theory that a strong work ethic could generate socioeconomic mobility. This belief was reinforced by industrialists
who subscribed to the teachings and philosophy of Herbert Spencer. Spencer is best known as one of the top
sociologists who took Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and applied it to
social theory (Johnson).
Interestingly,
it was Spencer who developed the well-known phrase “survival of the fittest,”
which he based on a hypothesis that self-preservation was an innate human trait,
and consequently equated social evolution with Darwin’s idea of biological
natural selection. Spencer believed societal
change was an inevitable evolutionary process in which only the strongest would
survive, and that weaker orders of humanity would eventually cease to exist
(Johnson).
Materially,
Spencer thought an elite class of wealth-holders stood a stronger change of
survival by the shear virtue of their capacity for social and economic adaptation. However, a complication for this form of
adaptive strategy, if true, implied that economically inferior people
were expendable, and if they were expendable wealth-holders would eventually run out of impoverished people
to exploit for economic gain. Spencer’s
philosophy was severely flawed, but his concept did not stop its perpetuation
(Johnson).
Writer Horatio Alger, became immensely popular from his “rags-to-riches” stories which promoted
one singularly common theme, that a strong work ethic and self-determination were the prescriptive
keys to economic success in a competitive labor market. Many of Alger’s “central characters...were
impoverished young boys who used their natural talents” to achieve material
success (MindTap).


Alger’s
blueprint for socioeconomic achievement caught on like wildfire as popular
culture of the period devoured millions of copies (MindTap). The concept of survival of the fittest became
so ingrained in American culture that it continues to be the first line of
moral defense for many wealth-holders, today.
While
Alger’s may have modeled his central characters—ordinary-yet-exceptional
individuals who transcend economic obscurity—after famous industrial giants
such as Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, Cornelius Vanderbilt, and J.P. Morgan, all who became pinnacles of
material success. However, the only wealthy industrialist of the period who actually rose
from oppressive poverty to stratospheric wealth was Irish immigrant Andrew Carnegie (MindTap). Which begs a question. Did
Horatio Alger offer instructional guides offering economic hope for the poor laborer, or
was his body of work institutionalized propaganda that reinforced Social
Darwinism during an age of unregulated capitalist industrialism?
Works Cited
"MindTap
- Cengage Learning." MindTap - Cengage Learning. Cengage Learning, n.d.
Web. 17 Apr. 2015.
<http://ng.cengage.com/static/nb/ui/index.html?nbId=107659&nbNodeId=27378118#!&parentId=27378345>.
15.2 The Rise of Big Business and Industrialization. Social Darwinism
Johnson,
Bethany. "Herbert Spencer: Theory & Social Darwinism." Sociology
101: Intro to Sociology. Study.com, n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2015.
Really exceptional writing!
ReplyDeleteI especially liked the ending of this post; left with open Question which provides author with more room to explore regarding this topics. Well done!