As
the nation’s population expanded at the turn of the 20th century, so
did its appetite for convenient processed foods. As factories mass-produced clothing,
furniture, appliances, among other items, they also industrialized food production
for the mass consumption. The following
excerpt offers a graphic description of the stockyards in Chicago’s
Packingtown, the terminus where live animals would be slaughtered and processed.
“They climbed a
long series of stairways outside of the building, to the top of its five or six
stories. Here was the chute, with its
river of hogs, all patiently toiling upward; there was place for them to rest
to cool off and then through another passageway they went into a room from
which there is no returning for hogs...they had chains which they fastened
about the leg of the nearest hog, and the other end of the chain they hooked
into one of the rings upon the wheel.
So, as the wheel turned, a hog was suddenly jerked off his feet and
borne aloft. At the same instant the car
was assailed by a most terrifying shriek...the shriek was followed by another,
louder and yet more agonizing...once started upon that journey, the hog never
came back; at the top of the wheel he was shunted off upon a trolley, and went
sailing down the room. And meantime
another was swung up, and then another, and another, until there was a double
line of them, each dangling by a foot and kicking in frenzy—and squealing...there
would come a momentary lull, and then a fresh outburst, louder than ever,
surging up to a deafening climax...one by one they hooked up the hogs, and one
by one with a swift stroke they slit their throats. There was a long line of hogs, with squeals
and lifeblood ebbing away together; until at last each started again, and
vanished with a splash into a huge vat of boiling water...it was porkmaking by
machinery, porkmaking by applied mathematics...they were so innocent, they came
so very trustingly; and they were so very human in their protests—and so
perfectly within their rights! They had
done nothing to deserve it; and it was adding insult to injury, as the thing
was done here, swinging them up in this cold-blooded, impersonal way...each one
of these hogs was a separate creature.
Some were white hogs, some were black; some were brown, some were spotted;
some were old, some young...each of them had an individuality of his own, a
will of his own, a hope and a heart’s desire; each was full of self-confidence,
of self-importance, and a sense of dignity.
And trusting and strong in faith he had gone about his business...while
a black shadow hung over him and a horrid Fate waited in his pathway...relentless,
remorseless, it was; all his protests, his screams, were nothing to it—it did
its cruel will with him, as if his wishes, his feelings, had simply believe
that there was nowhere a god of hogs, to whom this hog personality was
precious, to whom these hog squeals and agonies had a meaning? Who would take this hog into his arms and
comfort him, regard him for his work well done, and show him the meaning of his
sacrifice?”
The
preceding text is from Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel, The Jungle; a realist dramatization of the “fate” of millions of
animals slaughtered annually for human consumption (Sinclair). It also provided a dramatic account of the
plight of immigrant workers and their conditions of existence at the turn of the
century. While The Jungle realistically illustrated a dramatization of the
dehumanization of immigrant factory workers who were viewed as disposable as the
animals they murdered, the novel’s immense popularity raised public awareness
of the unsanitary and unhealthy conditions of factory-produced meat
products. Critics countered that because
Sinclair’s novel was a work of fiction, and that it was so extreme, they made
attempts to discredit its validity.
However, Sinclair, in response to numerous inquiries and the scrutiny of
industrialists, declared in a 1906 news publication that while the characters
in The Jungle were fictitious, the conditions of the stockyards, meat factories,
and laborers was “an exact and faithful picture of conditions as they exist[ed]
in Packingtown, Chicago,” and stated that he spent “seven weeks in the
stockyards district alone, living with the people,” substantiating workers
claims through the labor bosses, doctors, lawyers, and merchants, all whom confirmed
there was evidence that a system of graft was in place to keep the truth from
the public and the federal government (Sinclair “Is The Jungle True?”).

Works Cited
"MindTap
- Cengage Learning." MindTap - Cengage Learning. Cengage Learning, n.d.
Web. 17 Apr. 2015.
<http://ng.cengage.com/static/nb/ui/index.html?nbId=107659&nbNodeId=27378118#!&parentId=27378345>.
The Reform Impulse.
Sinclair,
Upton. ""Is 'The Jungle' True?" - Upton Sinclair - The
Independent." "Is 'The Jungle' True?" New York University
Digital Library Services, n.d. Web. 21 May 2015.
<http://dlib.nyu.edu/undercover/jungle-true-upton-sinclair-independent>.
Digital Library Technology Services
Sinclair,
Upton. "Chapter 3." The Jungle. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications,
2001. N. pag. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment